State v. Fisher
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Henne- • pin county, Young, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtVanderburgh, J.
The defendant was indicted for grand larceny in the second degree, undelr section 418, Penal Code. He is charged;, with having fraudulently appropriated to his own use certain personal, property intrusted to him to sell on commission by the owners thereof.. The principal contention of his counsel is that the evidence is insuffi- • cient to support the verdict, and especially because it fails to show a. fraudulent appropriation of the property within the county of Hen- ■ nepin.
We are agreed that the verdict cannot be disturbed on this ground,, and, if the evidence on the part of the state fell…
2Cited by1 opinion
- March v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1889