Legal Opinion
Citizens & Southern Bank v. Taggart
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided June 20, 1927No. 5772PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.
The answer to the first question propounded by the Court of Appeals depends upon the proper construction of section 2364 of the Civil Code of 1910. This section is as follows: “It shall be lawful to sue any of the incorporate banks of this State, in any county thereof, for any acts of their agents, where said banks or corporations may now have, or hereafter may establish, an agency.” Counsel for the plaintiff contend that a suit on any cause of action against an incorporated bank in this State may be brought in any county where that bank has an . established agency. They contend that the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- South-Western Railroad v. PaulkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1858
- Central Bank v. GibsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
- Tuggle v. Enterprise Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Etowah Milling Co. v. CrenshawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Davis v. Central Rail Road & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1855
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dependable Insurance Co. v. GibbsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
- WMW, Inc. v. American Honda Motor Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2012
- Martin & Thompson Inc. v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Speed Oil Co. v. AycockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Wmw, Inc. v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.