Legal Opinion

Cummins v. Nutt

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1834Published

Chancery. The case appears in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

The case made in the bill is in substance this, that the complainant was tenant in common with the defendant in one hundred and thirty-six acres of land, on which were a house, barn, and orchard. In 1825, the parties made a verbal partition of the land by running a line north and south, giving to the defendant about forty acres, including the improvements, and to the complainant, the remaining ninety-six acres unimproved. The parties ^took possession of their respective portions, agreed to exe- [714 cute deeds of release, made a partition fence on the line, and have ever since held…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. TilleyOregon Supreme Court · 1881

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API