Legal Opinion

Crooker v. Melick

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1885PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to the district court for Lancaster county. Heard below before Mitchell, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Cobb, Ch. J.

The plaintiff in error made and presented in the district ■court of Lancaster county bis motion in writing against the defendant in error, in the following words:

“Now comes the plaintiff in said cause, and moves the court for an order of amercement against Samuel Melick, sheriff of Lancaster county, in two causes of action, wherein Jabez C. Crooker is plaintiff, and Edward Haley is defendant, for the reason that executions in said sheriff’s hands were not returned by him within the time and manner provided by law, and the sheriff neglected and refused to levy the same- upon…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lee v. DolanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Ditsch v. FinnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Henry H. Shufeldt & Co. v. BarlassNebraska Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Ehlers v. GallagherNebraska Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Hellman v. SpielmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API