Legal Opinion

Northfield Development Co. v. City of Burlington

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 6, 2000No. 63A00PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

As to the issue on direct appeal based on the dissenting opinion, we affirm the majority decision of the Court of Appeals. We conclude that the petitions for discretionary review as to additional issues were improvidently allowed.

AFFIRMED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Guilford Financial Services, LLC v. City of BrevardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. The Royal Oak Concerned Citizens Ass'n v. Brunswick Cnty.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  3. Devaney v. City of BurlingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. Guilford Financial Services, LLC v. City of BrevardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. The Royal Oak Concerned Citizens Ass'n v. Brunswick Cnty.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014