St. Martin v. Hendershott
Oregon Supreme Court
From Marion: William Galloway, Judge. This is a suit by Margaret St. Martin against William M. Hendershott, Libbie E. Hendershott and Napoleon Legault, in which the plaintiff obtained a decree and defendants appeal. Plaintiff now moves to dismiss the appeal. In Banc.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Eakin
The plaintiff moves to dismiss the appeal for the reasons: (1) That the record shows that this appeal is from a decree, and the testimony, depositions and other papers containing the evidence, etc., do not accompany the transcript; (2) that the defendants failed to file their abstract within 20 days from the filing of the transcript as required by the rules of this court; and (3) the transcript and abstract do not intelligibly present any question to be decided by the court.
1. The transcript in this case consists of certified copies of the decree, notice of appeal and undertaking. This is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wyatt v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 1897
- Morrison's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1906
- Howe v. PattersonOregon Supreme Court · 1874
- Neal v. RoachOregon Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by5 opinions
- Walker v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- Cauldwell v. Bingham & Shelley Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Lasene v. SyvanenOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- Flynn v. DavidsonOregon Supreme Court · 1916
- Walker v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1927