Legal Opinion

Metheny v. Bohn

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 11, 1895PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Carroll county; the Hon. James Shaw, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Phillips

Complainant filed his bill for partition of certain real estate of and the assignment of dower to the widow in the estate of Samuel Bohn, the intestate from whom the land descended. Leonnetta C. Metheny and husband, and Lucinda Bohn, the widow, are made defendants. No controversy arises on the pleadings, nor in the ownership of the land alleged to be owned by the intestate, Samuel Bohn, nor the rights of the widow to dower. The contention is, whether the complainant is the child and heir-at-law of Lucinda Bohn and Samuel Bohn. The bill alleges that Samuel Bohn died November 12, 1891, leaving…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gaines v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  2. Illinois Land & Loan Co. v. BonnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Cuddy v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Jackson ex dem. Garland v. BrownerNew York Supreme Court · 1820
  5. Sawyer v. CampbellIllinois Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Zachmann v. ZachmannIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Metheny v. BohnIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Houghton v. DickinsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  4. Sims v. BirdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  5. Sugrue v. CrilleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API