Legal Opinion

Naomi CARAN, Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 8, 1988No. 87-1372PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Naomi Caran appeals pro se the district court’s 1 dismissal, and denial of her motion to reconsider that dismissal, of her action seeking judicial review of the Secretary of Health and Human Services’ (Secretary) decision regarding Caran’s application for widow’s benefits pursuant to Title II of the Social Security Act (Act). We affirm.

In Caran’s initial application for benefits, she listed her date of birth as August 15, 1922. Subsequent to the granting of benefits based on the 1922 birthdate, Caran filed for a reconsideration as to her date of birth. She claimed that her correct birth-date…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Tisdale v. DobbsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Andrew Bess v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  2. Brenda BOLDEN for Gervase BOLDEN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  3. Andrew Bess v. Jo Anne BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  4. Brenda BOLDEN for Gervase BOLDEN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  5. Heather D. Grady v. Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2026

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API