Legal Opinion
Los Angeles Police Department v. United Reporting Publishing Corp.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 12, 2000No. 98-678PublishedCited by 244 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Rehnquist
California Govt. Code Ann. § 6254(f)(3) (West Supp. 1999) places two conditions on public access to arrestees’ addresses — that the person requesting an address declare that the request is being made for one of five prescribed purposes, and that the requester also declare that the address will not be used directly or indirectly to sell a product or service.
The District Court permanently enjoined enforcement of the statute, and the Court of Appeals affirmed, holding that the statute was facially invalid because it unduly burdens commercial speech. We hold that the statutory section in question…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by244 opinions
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
- McBurney v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- United States v. Sineneng-SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Dickerson Ex Rel. Davison v. NapolitanoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
239 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.