Legal Opinion
Darensbourg v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided November 9, 1995No. 94 CA 0761PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
| ¿PARRO, Judge.
In this personal injury action, the trial judge found that the force used in detaining Alyson M. Darensbourg (“Darensbourg”) was excessive and entered judgment in her favor against The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Co., Inc. d/b/a Superfresh (“A & P”) and the store’s manager, awarding her reimbursement of medical expenses and general damages. From this judgment, A & P and the store manager appeal. For the following reasons, the judgment is annulled and vacated, and the case is remanded to the Baton Rouge City Court.
Facts and Procedural History
Darensbourg was shopping at A &…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Mart v. HillSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- Ledoux v. Southern Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
- Zion v. StockfiethLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987
- Everett v. SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bass v. National Maintenance Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
- Bankers Ins. Co. v. StateLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
- Mullins v. MISS. VALLEY SILICA CO., INC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
- In re State I.K.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- Andrus v. Crowley Laundry & Dry CleanersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.