Ito v. 324 East 9th Street Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*817Motions for reargument are addressed to the sound discretion of the court which decided the original motion and may be granted upon a showing that the court overlooked or misapprehended the facts or law or for some reason mistakenly arrived at its earlier decision (see E.W. Howell Co., Inc. v S.A.F. La Sala Corp., 36 AD3d 653, 654 [2007]; Carrillo v PM Realty Group, 16 AD3d 611 [2005]; Viola v City of New York, 13 AD3d 439, 440 [2004]). Contrary to the contention of the appellant 324 East 9th Street Corp., the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting leave to reargue to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Grande v. PeteroyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Cherebin v. Empress Ambulance Service, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- E.W. Howell Co. v. S.A.F. La Sala Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Alvarado v. Beth Israel Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Ciminello v. HartfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Vaccariello v. Meineke Car Care Center, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Fuessel v. ChinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Hackshaw v. Mercy Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.