Legal Opinion

Pickens v. Campbell

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 8, 1919No. 21,994PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Shawnee district court, division No. 2; George H. Whitcomb, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered' by

Burch, J.:

This is a second appeal. The general nature of •the controversy is indicated in the former opinion, Pickens v. Campbell, 98 Kan. 518, 159 Pac. 21. On return of the cause to the district court a trial occurred which resulted in judgment for the defendants. The plaintiffs appeal.

The chief subject of dispute was the nature of the uninventoried real-estate contracts, the real estate itself having been scheduled as such. In the former opinion it was said:

“Ordinarily the right to the purchase price of land, contracted to be sold but not conveyed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Drollinger v. CarsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  2. Williams v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  3. Pickens v. CampbellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  4. Brown ex rel. Branner v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  5. Commissioners Douglas County v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1870

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Tomasic v. Kansas City, Kansas Port AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1981
  2. Heard v. GephartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  3. In Re Estate of SnyderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  4. In Re the Estate of HillsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1977
  5. Pickens v. MerriamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1921

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API