Legal Opinion

Rostuca Holdings, Ltd. v. Polo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 5, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered May 12, 1995, dismissing the complaint, and bringing up for review an order, same court and Justice, entered May 3, 1995, which, inter alia, granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the fraud cause of action as time-barred, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, defendant’s motion denied, and the complaint reinstated.

*403Plaintiff brought this action against defendant premised upon allegations that she was an aider and abettor of a fraudulent investment scheme perpetrated by her former husband. The timeliness of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Varnberg v. MinnickDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
  2. Rutland House Associates v. DanoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. CSAM Capital, Inc. v. LauderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Chambers v. WeinsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  3. Yatter v. William Morris Agency, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Klein v. Arbor National Mortgage, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API