Legal Opinion

State v. Sandt

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 19, 2000No. 2D99-1136PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRINGER, Judge.

The State challenges an order granting, in part, Robert Sandt’s motion in limine *137and motion to suppress blood-alcohol test results in this DUI case. Sandt moved to suppress the results of two blood-alcohol tests, arguing that the administrative rules governing sample collection, storage and analysis are inadequate to ensure rehable results. See Fla. Adm.Code Rules 11D-8.011-.014 (1997). In granting Sandt’s motion, the trial court ruled that the State would not be allowed to rely upon the statutory presumption of impairment provided by section 316.1934, Florida Statutes (1997),…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BenderSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
  2. Robertson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  3. Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
  4. State v. MilesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  5. State v. TownsendDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. SerceyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  2. State v. SandtSupreme Court of Florida · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API