State v. Sandt
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
STRINGER, Judge.
The State challenges an order granting, in part, Robert Sandt’s motion in limine *137and motion to suppress blood-alcohol test results in this DUI case. Sandt moved to suppress the results of two blood-alcohol tests, arguing that the administrative rules governing sample collection, storage and analysis are inadequate to ensure rehable results. See Fla. Adm.Code Rules 11D-8.011-.014 (1997). In granting Sandt’s motion, the trial court ruled that the State would not be allowed to rely upon the statutory presumption of impairment provided by section 316.1934, Florida Statutes (1997),…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. BenderSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Robertson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Richardson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
- State v. MilesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- State v. TownsendDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. SerceyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
- State v. SandtSupreme Court of Florida · 2000