Legal Opinion
Ayers v. Continental Casualty Co.
District Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided December 11, 1996No. Civil Action 96-0023-DPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KISER, Chief Judge.
Before me is defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The parties have fully briefed the issues involved and have presented oral argument. The motion is therefore ripe for disposition. For the reasons contained herein, I am of the opinion that defendant’s motion should be GRANTED.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND:
This action is a claim for accidental death and dismemberment (“AD & D”) benefits arising out of the fatal shooting by plaintiff Hilda Taylor Ayers (“Mrs. Ayers”) of her late husband, Johnny Jefferson Ayers (“Mr. Ayers”) on April 24, 1995, in their…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Shaw v. StroudCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Mary Jane Wickman v. Northwestern National Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Balthis v. Aig Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2000
- Benito T. PEREZ, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Benito T. PEREZ, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998