Legal Opinion

Department of Industrial Relations v. Seaboard Surety Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 21, 1996No. D024620PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NARES, Acting P. J.

This case requires determination of the appropriate statute of limitation in an action by the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement of the State of California Department of Industrial Relations (DLSE), on behalf of workers on a public works project (Lab. Code, §§ 96.7, 98.3, subd. (a) 1 ), for prevailing wages (§§ 1771, 1774) against the surety furnishing the payment bond required for the project (Civ. Code, §§ 3247, 3248). The trial court ruled the 90-day limitation period in section 1775 applies to bar this action by DLSE against the surety. Thus, the trial court…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. People v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Producers Dairy Delivery Co. v. Sentry InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  4. People v. HutchinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. People v. ReidCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States Golf Ass'n v. Arroyo Software Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  2. Fed. Ins. Co. v. Superior Court of Ventura Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Oldcastle Precast, Inc. v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. Friends of Spring St. v. Nev. City, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  5. Johnson v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API