Legal Opinion · Dissent

Schrader Byrd & Companion, P.L.L.C. v. Marks

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided July 30, 2007No. 33184Published

1DissentBenjamin, Justice

The Majority affirmed the circuit court’s finding of summary judgment based upon the Majority’s conclusion that the fees-from-future-royalties arrangement was not per se impermissible. In so doing, the Majority established a factor test to determine whether an attorney is entitled to receive fees through such an arrangement. The first factor is the consideration of whether the terms of the fee agreement between the attorney and client provide for a fees-from-future-royalties arrangement. The second factor is “whether, when viewed in the context of the entire representation of the client by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Committee on Legal Ethics of West Virginia State Bar v. TattersonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Shiya v. National Committee of GibranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API