Joost v. United States
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Per curiam
Petitioner Robert Joost appeals pro se from a district court decision dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition as untimely. See 336 F.Supp.2d 185 (D.R.I.2004). He there sought to advance a single claim under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194,10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), based on documents he obtained through a post-judgment Freedom of Information Act request, see 5 U.S.C. § 552 (FOIA).
Joost received a certificate of appealability (COA) to address the timeliness issue; but that issue turns out to raise difficult questions which we are reluctant to resolve in this pro se setting, and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. GendronCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Holmes v. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Conley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- Gross v. RoyceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2021
- Holmes v. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012