Legal Opinion

Joost v. United States

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided April 9, 2007No. 04-2317PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner Robert Joost appeals pro se from a district court decision dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition as untimely. See 336 F.Supp.2d 185 (D.R.I.2004). He there sought to advance a single claim under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194,10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), based on documents he obtained through a post-judgment Freedom of Information Act request, see 5 U.S.C. § 552 (FOIA).

Joost received a certificate of appealability (COA) to address the timeliness issue; but that issue turns out to raise difficult questions which we are reluctant to resolve in this pro se setting, and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. United States v. GendronCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Holmes v. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  2. Conley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  3. Gross v. RoyceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2021
  4. Holmes v. SpencerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API