Legal Opinion

Laney v. Monsanto Chemical Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 22, 1961No. 5-2326PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGeorge Rose Smith, J.

These two cases, consolidated for trial in the court below, involve the title to a forty-acre tract of land that was formerly owned by Charles Richardson, the parties’ common source of title, who died in 1935. The land was sold for nonpayment of taxes in 1925, and two years later a tax deed was executed and delivered to the purchasers, George W. Hays and J. B. Newton.

There are three sets of claimants to at least some interest in the land. First, the heirs of the tax title purchasers, Hays and Newton, assert a claim of absolute ownership on the basis of two years actual possession under the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Claybrooke v. BarnesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  2. Cotton v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  3. Johnson v. ElderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  4. McFarlane v. MorganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Adams v. BruderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  2. Hurst v. RiceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
  3. Edwards v. HallCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
  4. Laney v. Monsanto Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  5. McDowell v. KingSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API