Legal Opinion · Dissent

Miller v. People

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 3, 1933No. 13,231Published

1DissentJustice Bouck

From tbe judgment of affirmance I dissent.

Tbe single issue in the case at bar, as I view it, lies in tbe question: Has tbe defendant, Miller, plaintiff in error bere, bad tbe fair and impartial trial guaranteed him by tbe Constitution of tbe United States and by tbe Constitution and laws of Colorado? We may discuss this particular error and that, yet, when all is said and done, we come back to tbe fundamental question just stated.

Our court, by adopting rule 35 (“Counsel will be confined to a discussion of the errors stated, but the court may, in 'its discretion, notice any other error…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Lincoln v. FrenchSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Solander v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1873
  3. Boykin v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  4. Roberts v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1888
  5. Babcock v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API