Legal Opinion

Jones v. Klachkin

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1960PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAron Steuer, J.

Plaintiff alleges that he was employed in a book bindery. His employers rented a machine called a Seybold flat paper cutter from the defendants. In using this machine plaintiff alleges that he was severely injured. The complaint contains allegations that the defendants warranted to plaintiff’s employer that the machine was safe to use and that it was unsafe in that it lacked guards.

These facts do not constitute a cause of action. It is elementary that a warranty applies only to the parties to a contract (Galvin v. Lynch, 137 Misc. 126). That is not to say that one who supplies a defective…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Campo v. ScofieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
  2. Galvin v. LynchCity of New York Municipal Court · 1930

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sarnoff v. Charles Schad, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Rourke v. GarzaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. Rourke v. GarzaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API