Legal Opinion

Jarbee v. Steamboat Daniel Hillman

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1853PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to St. Lotds Court of Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtGamble, Judge

The plaintiffs filed their petition against the Daniel Hillman, and on that petition, the clerk issued a warrant in the name of Belt alone. The boat was seized and sold, and some of the creditors proved their claims, when a motion was made to set aside the order of sale and all proceedings, for the alleged irregularity in the writ, in being in the name of only one of the plaintiffs. The court overruled the motion and the plaintiffs excepted, and bring the case here.

1. The case of Jones v. Cox and others, 7 Mo. Rep. 173, presented the same question on a motion to quash a writ, and there it was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jones v. CoxSupreme Court of Missouri · 1841

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Stone v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API