Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Husted

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 19, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Each of these suits, was brought to recover compensation for personal injuries received by the respective plaintiffs. In the first suit compensation was also' sought for damage done to an automobile owned by TTallie Boyd. The injuries and damage alleged were received in a collision between an automobile belonging to Halide Boyd, in which both of the plaintiffs were riding, and a car belonging to the defendant. Hosted. The collision occurred at the intersection of üvo roads in Gloucester county. The two cases were tried together, and the .trial resulted in 'verdicts in favor of the plaintiffs.…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Springdale Park, Inc. v. AndriotisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  2. Roy v. Oregon Short Line R. R. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Polgar v. KantorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1925
  4. Galveston Truck Line Corp. v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Kruschka v. KonvitzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API