Box Office Pictures, Inc. v. Board of Finance & Revenue
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Eagen,
To the separate appeals and complaints in mandamus filed in the court below by appellants for the refund of monies paid as license fees to the Commonwealth, the defendant Board of Finance and Revenue of the Commonwealth filed four preliminary objections, the last of which, in effect, set up a five-year limitations statute in bar of the action. The lower court sustained this particular objection and dismissed petitioners’ pleadings.
Appellants are Philadelphia distributors of motion pictures. As such, they had been required by the Act of May 15, 1915, P. L. 534, as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Cox v. CollectorSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Board of Finance & Revenue of CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Land Holding Corp. v. Board of Finance & RevenueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Philadelphia v. Ridge Ave. Ry. Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1891
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Paramount Film Distributing Corp. v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Philadelphia Life Insurance v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Lilian v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Cianfrani v. Commonwealth, State Employees' Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- August v. StasakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.