Legal Opinion
Marriage of Hill v. Hill
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided September 25, 1984No. CX-84-144, C7-84-330 and C5-84-665PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
The wife appeals from a dissolution decree which upheld the validity of an ante-nuptial agreement. Pursuant to that agreement, wife was awarded a $20,000 property settlement and no maintenance. The husband appeals the award of retroactive child support and the award of attorney’s fees to enable the wife to prosecute an appeal, contending the award was precluded by the antenuptial agreement. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
FACTS
Carolyn and Tom Hill were married in 1974. Each had been married and divorced before. At the time of the marriage, the wife owned…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Appleby v. Estates of ApplebySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
- Gross v. GrossOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Newman v. NewmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Malchow v. MalchowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Estate of Serbus v. SerbusSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McAlpine v. McAlpineSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
- Jodi Lynn Erpelding v. Timothy John ErpeldingSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
- Martin v. FarberCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Marriage of Alvord v. AlvordCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Sogg v. Nevada State BankNevada Supreme Court · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.