Legal Opinion

Searfoss v. Bowen

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1925No. 4913Published

1Opinion of the Court

Litz, Judge:

The plaintiffs, R. G. Searfoss and A. C. Henthorn, complain of a decree in the Circuit Court of Wetzel County dis missing their bill for specific performance and, upon the answer of defendants Lewis Bowen, and Ada Bowen, treated as a cross-bill, decreeing cancellation of the contract upon which plaintiffs predicate their right for relief.

The Paden City Land Company, being the owner of Lot 33 on Stephens Street, in the town of Paden City,' Wetzel County, on June 5, 1920, entered into a written contract with defendant Lewis Bowen for the sale thereof, in consideration of $375.00 to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Talley v. Robinson's assigneeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1872
  2. Brothers v. Moore, Clemens & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1908
  3. Harman v. MossSupreme Court of Virginia · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API