Legal Opinion
Mendez v. Radec Corp.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided January 30, 2006No. 03-CV-6342LPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Patrick Mendez, commenced this action against his former employer, Radec Corporation (“Radec”), and two of its officers, alleging that Radec violated the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., and the New York Labor Law (“Labor Law”), for failure to pay wages to which Mendez was legally entitled. On February 26, 2004, the Court issued a Decision and Order directing that potential class members be given notice of the existence of this action and of their rights to opt in to the action under the FLSA’s “collective action”…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Cullen v. MargiottaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Harriscom Svenska Ab v. Harris CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- In Re Fugazy Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- German by German v. Federal Home Loan Mortg. Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mendez v. Radec Corp.District Court, W.D. New York · 2009
- Neary v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2007
- Jones v. PlilerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022