Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Kelser

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 26, 1934No. 633PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By STEVENS, J.

Two of the assessments claimed — that is, the one for sewer connections and the one for water connections — are by statute exempted from the 33 1/3% limitation statute, and therefore plaintiffs are not entitled to any relief as to them.

The agreed statement of facts shows the aggregate of the two other assessments against plaintiffs’ property, exclusive of interest, to be greatly in excess of 33 1/3% of *355the value of said property as improved. It is conceded that plaintiffs did not avail themselves of the remedies afforded them under §3848, GC, and the question is now…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mealy v. Cuyahoga Falls CityCuyahoga County Probate Court · 1937
  2. Pelton v. Board of County Commissioners of Wood Co.Wood County Court of Common Pleas · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API