Legal Opinion
Danielsen v. Entre Rios Rys. Co.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided October 21, 1927No. 1463PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COLEMAN, District Judge.
In tMs case the master of a Norwegian vessel entered into a charter party in London with the agents of South American charterers, for the carriage of coal from the port of Baltimore, or a nearby port, to South America. The charterers were to notify the master before arrival at just what port he should load. The charter contained a clause providing that “any question arising under this charter shall be referred to arbitration in London in the' customary manner.”
The charterers failed to notify the master before arrival as to where he should load, so that he was forced to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- The BelgenlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- The PesaroSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Panama Railroad v. Napier Shipping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- United States Asphalt Refining Co. v. Trinidad Lake Petroleum Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1915
- The AtlantenSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Shanferoke Coal & Supply Corp. of Delaware v. Westchester Service Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Batson Yarn & Fabrics MacHinery Goup, Inc. v. Saurer-Allma GmbH-Allgauer MaschinenbauDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1970
- Andros Compania Maritima, S.A. v. Andre & Cie., S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- The VolsinioDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1929
- Fox v. the Giuseppe MazziniDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.