Legal Opinion
Zimmer v. Closky
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 22, 1936No. Appeal, 252PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, P. J.,
The printed record filed in this appeal does not sufficiently present the relevant material facts in the case. We have, however, consulted the original record which supplies the deficiencies.
Bernard Zimmer, claiming to have been accidentally injured while in the course of his employment with defendant, Closky, filed a petition for compensation with the Workmen’s Compensation Board. The referee made an open award of compensation, and on appeal to the Board, the award was sustained. Defendant then appealed to the court of common pleas, which on June 18, 1935 dismissed…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Graham v. Hillman Coal & Coke Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Furman v. Standard P. Steel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sayre v. Textile Machine WorksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Shay v. North Side Bank & Trust Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Pikutas v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Angelaccio v. Kaiser Fleetwings, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Burchewsky v. Max Bailis & Sons, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.