Hooton v. Jarman Chevrolet Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion
On the Merits
(296 P. 36)
H. 8. Murphy, of Marshfield (Goss, Murphy & Skip-worth, of Marshfield, on the brief) for appellants. Leroy Lomax, of Portland, for respondent. BROWN, J.
The single point argued here relates to the ruling of the court upon defendants ’ motion for a new trial. The motion avers:
‘ ‘ That during the progress of said trial the Coos Bay Times, a daily newspaper of general circulation, published in Marshfield, Coos county, Oregon, published a news item stating that one Nathaniel G. Anderson was an adjuster with the Oregon Automobile Insurance Company, and that he was here…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. TullerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1867
- Cogswell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
- Martin v. TidwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1867
- Osmun v. WintersOregon Supreme Court · 1896
- Hooton v. Jarman Chevrolet Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.