Legal Opinion

Hooton v. Jarman Chevrolet Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 21, 1931Published

1Opinion

On the Merits

(296 P. 36)

H. 8. Murphy, of Marshfield (Goss, Murphy & Skip-worth, of Marshfield, on the brief) for appellants. Leroy Lomax, of Portland, for respondent. BROWN, J.

The single point argued here relates to the ruling of the court upon defendants ’ motion for a new trial. The motion avers:

‘ ‘ That during the progress of said trial the Coos Bay Times, a daily newspaper of general circulation, published in Marshfield, Coos county, Oregon, published a news item stating that one Nathaniel G. Anderson was an adjuster with the Oregon Automobile Insurance Company, and that he was here…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. TullerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1867
  2. Cogswell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
  3. Martin v. TidwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1867
  4. Osmun v. WintersOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Hooton v. Jarman Chevrolet Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API