Legal Opinion

Ramirez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 15, 1931No. 13789PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

CALHOUN, Judge.

The offense is castration, with the minimum penalty of five years in the penitentiary assessed.

A former appeal of this case will be found reported in 112 Texas Crim. Rep., 332, 16 S. W. (2d) at page 814. The prosecution is based under article 1168, P. C.

The undisputed evidence in this case shows that the appellant castrated and removed both of the testicles of the injured party, which was admitted by the appellant. The only difference as to what actually occurred, as shown by the statements of the injured party and of the appellant, was the fact that the injured party contended…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Silver v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. McKenzie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  3. Vargas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. English v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  5. Hollingsworth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  2. Freeney v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1933
  3. Langrum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935
  4. Akers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Langrum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API