Legal Opinion

Milliken v. Jacono

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 21, 2014Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Todd

I concur with the majority that the Superior Court’s order-must be affirmed, as I conclude the occurrence of a murder or suicide in a house does not constitute a material defect in the property under the Real Estate Seller Disclosure Law (“RESDL”), 68 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 7301 et seq. Therefore, I agree that Appellant failed to state a claim against Appellees for fraud, negligent misrepresentation, or violations of the Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law (“UTPCPL”), 73 P.S. § 2Q‘l-2(4)(xxi). I write separately to explain the legal basis for my conclusion.

In order to prevail on a claim…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Yocca v. Pittsburgh Steelers Sports, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Bortz v. NoonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Bennett v. A.T. Masterpiece Homes at Broadsprings, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Colaizzi v. BeckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Bukoskey v. Palombo, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Beaver County2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API