Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hale v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 16, 1959No. 31242Published

1DissentWoodley, Judge

The majority follow their holding in Dewberry v. State, 162 Tex.Cr.R. 160, 283 S.W.2d 399, and in support thereof cite as authority the opinion of Judge Lattimore in Ermis v. State, “intimating that it is the mandatory duty of this Court to dismiss an appeal upon request.” (5 Tex.Jur.2d, Sec. 336, Note 2.)

A distinguishment between this case and the Dewberry case is that Dewberry was permitted to withdraw his notice of appeal in the trial court and he requested that the transcript and statement of facts not be filed. The dissent was based upon the fact that Dewberry was permitted to withdraw…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Henderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958
  2. Malone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1959
  3. Gaines v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1950
  4. Adcock v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1948
  5. Dewberry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API