Legal Opinion · Dissent

Smith v. Persichetti

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 14, 2000No. A00A0141Published

1DissentBarnes, Judge

I respectfully dissent because a jury issue exists as to whether the lease option contract requires Smith to return the $125,000 down payment made by Persichetti and O’Brien.

There are three steps in the process of contract construction. The trial court must first decide whether the contract language is ambiguous; if it is ambiguous, the trial court must then apply the applicable rules of construction (OCGA § 13-2-2); if after doing so the trial court determines that an ambiguity still remains the jury must then resolve the ambiguity.

(Citation and punctuation omitted.) Karlan, Inc. v. King,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Prophecy Corp. v. Charles Rossignol, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1986
  2. Karlan, Inc. v. KingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  3. Crestlawn Memorial Park v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  4. Sagon Motorhomes, Inc. v. Southtrust Bank of Georgia, N.A.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. RAYMOND ROWE FURNITURE COMPANY v. SimmsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API