Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Waugh

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1903No. 4672Published

Original Proceeding for Disbarment.

1DissentAnders, J.

(dissenting)- — The sole question presented for determination in this proceeding is whether this court has jurisdiction, in the first instance, to disbar attorneys who have been admitted to the bar of this state.

The majority of the court has determined that it has not such jurisdiction, but I am constrained to dissent from that conclusion.

It is true that the jurisdiction of the supreme court and superior courts of this state is defined by the constitution. And it is also true that original and exclusive jurisdiction of disbarment proceedings is not vested in the superior courts by any express…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Sanborn v. KimballSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1875
  3. In re OWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
  4. In re Proceedings for the Disbarment of LambuthWashington Supreme Court · 1898
  5. People ex rel. Elliott v. GreenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API