Consolidated Capital Corp. v. Chernoff
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We affirm the judgment of the trial court which in effect found that the Statute of Frauds, section 725.01, Florida Statutes (1981), did not bar appellee’s claim. There was competent evidence on the basis of which the trial court could find that the obligation of appellant to pay for services rendered by appellee to appellant's subsidiary corporation was a direct, not a collateral, obligation. See Sanders v. Hodges, 109 Fla. 391, 147 So. 571 (1933); Clover Interior Systems, Inc. v. General Development Corp., 357 So.2d 459 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978); Troup Brothers, Inc. v. State of Florida, 135 So.2d…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Revere Copper and Brass Incorporated v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, and Third-Party v. George A. Fuller Company, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Stone v. Pembroke Lakes Trailer Park, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
- Taussig v. Ins. Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
- Troup Brothers, Inc. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
- Sanders v. HodgesSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.