Legal Opinion

Stein v. Hart

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 7, 1948PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by defendant from an order of the Chemung Special Term of the Supreme Court denying Ms motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency. The plaintiff is an attorney at law and has brought the action for professional services rendered to defendant’s wife. Such services are regarded as necessaries for which the husband is liable. Order unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Present — Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Brewster, Foster and Russell, JJ.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schulgasser v. MarionBuffalo City Court · 1957