Stoll v. Principi
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
This case arises out of what is alleged to have been discriminatory action by a government employer. After testing the waters in two different administrative fora, the claimant abruptly repaired to the federal district court. That court rejected her importunings on procedural grounds. Concluding, as we do, that the claimant’s original election of remedies barred her subsequent attempt to sue, we affirm the dismissal of her action.
Because the district court acted disposi-tively on a motion to dismiss, we glean the few facts that are necessary to an undertaking of this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Rogan v. MeninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Redondo-Borges v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
- 39 Fair empl.prac.cas. 162, 38 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 35,583 Eligio Castro and Rafael Diaz Diaz v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Gabriel v. PrebleCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Bartlett v. Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- De Aruajo v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- Simmons v. AstrueDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2010
- Galvin, et al. v. EMC Mortgage Corporation, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2013
- Holland v. Department of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2014
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.