Legal Opinion

Briones v. Mendocino Cafe, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided June 12, 2024No. 1:23-cv-04701Unknown

1Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 EUREKA DIVISION 4 5 ROBERT BRIONES, Case No. 23-cv-04701-RMI 6 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SET 7 v. ASIDE DEFAULT 8 MENDOCINO CAFE, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 15 9 Defendant. 10 11 Before the court is Defendant Mendocino Cafe, Inc.’s Motion to Set Aside Clerk’s Default 12 (Dkt. 15). The Motion is fully briefed, and the court heard oral argument on the matter on May 21, 13 2024. (Dkt. 21). For the reasons that follow, the court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion. 14 BACKGROUND 15 This case arises from a visit by Plaintiff to a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Egelhoff v. Egelhoff Ex Rel. BreinerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Eduard Falk and Lettye M. Falk v. Sun Cha AllenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. Robinson v. Missouri Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  4. Yan v. General Pot, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API