Legal Opinion
Brannock v. Brannock
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 1986No. 16,192PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RIORDAN, Chief Justice.
Corley Sue Brannock (petitioner) brought suit in district court for past due child support against John F. Brannock (respondent). The district court dismissed petitioner’s petition for past due child support and modified future support downward. Petitioner appealed to the Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court’s judgment. This Court granted petitioner’s petition for certiorari.
FACTS
The facts are well stated in the Court of Appeals opinion, 104 N.M. 416, 722 P.2d 667. Therefore, in the interest of clarity only, we will reiterate briefly…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Toltec International, Inc. v. Village of RuidosoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Spingola v. SpingolaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
- Hunter v. HunterUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Britton v. BrittonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
- Hittson v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Landavazo v. SanchezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- State ex rel. Wallace v. State Medical BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- Albuquerque Concrete Coring Co. v. Pan Am World Services, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Kueffer v. KuefferNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- State ex rel. Wallace v. State Med. Bd. of OhioOhio Supreme Court · 2000
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.