Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John R. Maynard

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 2014No. 2013AP002362-DPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. We review a stipulation filed pursuant to SCR 22.12 1 by the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) and Attorney John R. Maynard. In the stipulation, Attorney Maynard agrees that by failing to give timely written notice of the suspension of his license to practice law, and consequent inability to continue as counsel, to each of his clients; by continuing to practice law after the date this court ordered his license suspended; by knowingly making a false statement to a court that his license had already been reinstated; by repeated use of firm letterhead while he was suspended and other false…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. HahnfeldWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  2. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against MaynardWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Matthew H. MarxWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. John R. MaynardWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Matthew H. MarxWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Matthew H. MarxWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Melinda R. AlfredsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API