Legal Opinion
Radio Corp. v. Dubilier Condenser Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 18, 1932No. 4279PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from a decree of the District Court holding' claim 9 of the Dunniore Patent No. 1,635,117 valid and infringed by the defendant’s apparatus of the types known as Loud Speaker 104, Radiola 17 and Radiola 18, respectively. 34 F.(2d) 450. The ease was consolidated for trial with two other suits between substantially the same parties, one of which concerned the Lowell and Dunniore Patent No. 1,455,141, previously disposed of by this court on appeal in an opinion reported at 59 F.(2d) 305. Although the ultimate issues as to validity in the two eases are quite…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Grinnell Washing MacHine Co. v. E. E. Johnson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Radio Corporation v. Dubilier Condenser CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1932
- Shaw Electric Crane Co. v. WorthingtonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1897
- Shaw Electric Crane Co. v. ShriverCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
3Cited by8 opinions
- R. M. Hollingshead Co. v. Bassick Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
- Mercantile National Bank of Chicago v. Howmet CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1975
- Julius Levine & Co. v. Automatic Paper Machinery Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1933
- Hookless Fastener Co. v. GreenbergDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1937
- United States v. Dubilier Condenser Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.