Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Campbell

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 21, 1992No. 00958PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

The instant appeal requires us to visit once again the dimensions of a “stop and frisk” conducted with less than probable cause and to evaluate the circumstances under which such a procedure is constitutionally permissible.

Appellant Braden Campbell was arrested along with two companions, Richard DeMatteis and Larry Bonetti, and each was charged with various counts of drug and weapons offenses. Although the cases were not joined for trial, a consolidated omnibus pretrial hearing was held on August 15, 1989, at which appellant, DeMatteis and Bonetti sought to suppress physical…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Alabama v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  5. Commonwealth v. RodgersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LittleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. ValentinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. In the Interest of B.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Commonwealth v. VasquezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Commonwealth v. MontavoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API