Legal Opinion

Selby v. Hurd

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1883PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Osceola. (Judkins, J.) Troyer. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Graves, O. J.

The plaintiff recovered damages in trover for a large quantity of lumbering appliances, and the defendants brought error.

August 20th, 1880, the plaintiff entered into a written contract with defendants to go upon certain of their lands and take off several million feet of saw logs and deliver them' on skidways on the main line of the Evart & Osceola Railroad. ■ He was to commence about the 23d of the same' month and make delivery as fast as possible and fully complete the entire job on or before the first day of May, 1881.. The contract contained the following special provision:

*2“…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Niederhauser v. Detroit Citizens' Street-Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. McClureMississippi Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Supreme Tent v. FisherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. M. M. Walker Co. v. Dubuque Fruit & Produce Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API