Legal Opinion
Stransky v. Healthone of Denver, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided March 7, 2013No. Civil Action No. 11-cv-02888-WJM-MJWPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CONTEMPT
WILLIAM J. MARTÍNEZ, District Judge.
In this collective action, Plaintiffs Lisa Stransky, Natalie Fiore, Erin Perez, Helen
*1103Geist, Angela Vanlengen, Brooke Thompson, Mildred Hamilton, and Nicole Wagner (“Plaintiffs”), individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, bring claims against Defendant HealthONE of Denver, Inc. (“Defendant” or “HealthONE”) alleging that Defendant faded to adequately compensate them in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- International Union, United Mine Workers v. BagwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Gulf Oil Co. v. BernardSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Randolph v. Powercomm Construction, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Anduin Lightner, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Davita, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2026
- Felps v. Mewbourne Oil Company, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2020
- Gamboa v. Kiss NutraceuticalsDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2024
- John Mikall Paul Swietlicki v. Joshua LessarDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2026
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.