Legal Opinion

Paul Rochester Investment Co. v. United States

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided June 7, 1988No. Civ. A. CA 3-84-0867-GPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER

FISH, District Judge.

This case is before the court on cross motions for summary judgment. The parties have agreed that all of the facts necessary to dispose of this case are undisputed; 1

After reviewing the motions and briefs of all parties, the court concludes that as a matter of law, there being no genuine issue for trial, the United States is entitled to judgment against plaintiff Paul Rochester Investment Co. (“Rochester”) and Rochester is entitled to judgment against defendant C & A Development Co. (“C & A Development”).

I. Background

A. Nature of the Case

This is a dispute…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Aquilino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. United States v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. United States v. BessSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lac Du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians v. WilliquetteDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1986
  2. International Brotherhood Of Teamsters v. Southwest Airlines CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  3. International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Southwest Airlines Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  4. Paul Rochester Investments v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API