Legal Opinion

Morris v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 23, 2011No. 34, September Term, 2010PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarrell, J.

Don Henley sang, “trying to get down to the heart of the matter,” often the “more I know, the less I understand.” 1 Apropos of that sentiment, in the present case, the parties brief and argue an array of issues, only a few of which are actually before this Court and which we shall decide. In the process, they glaze the proceedings with a certain degree of opaqueness.

After an extensive review of the record, we conclude that Franklin Morris (“Morris”) preserved a confrontation right challenge for our review. Moreover, we hold that the “miscellaneous agreement” (equivalent to a guilty plea…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Boland v. BolandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  2. Peterson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  3. Wagner v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  4. Gross v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  5. Dionas v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API