Legal Opinion
State v. Phillips
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided July 2, 1990No. 17891PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWANSTROM, Judge.
A jury in Minidoka County found Hartzell Phillips guilty of three violations of an ordinance of the City of Acequia: failure to license a dog, failure to restrain the dog, and interfering with a city official when Phillips released the dog from impoundment. A magistrate imposed a fine for each violation. Phillips appealed to the district court. The district court, acting in its appellate capacity, upheld the convictions. This appeal followed. We likewise affirm.
Phillips has acted as his own attorney in these proceedings. He has listed numerous issues in this appeal but for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Baldner v. Bennett's, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1982
- Matter of Estate of KunzlerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
- Price v. Aztec Limited, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1985
- Bernard v. RobyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
- State v. BrakeIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. WhiteleyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
- State v. LeferinkIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- Berning v. DrumwrightIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
- State v. Wenkai LiIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. DunlapIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.