Legal Opinion

Kesler v. Brown

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 1, 1994No. 94-01031PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The petitioner, an attorney, seeks certiorari review of the circuit court’s order denying him the right to depose the respondent, his former client, in this action for legal malpractice and fraud. The court denied discovery because the respondent had been previously deposed in the bar grievance proceeding he had brought against the petitioner. In this case, we hold that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law, leaving the petitioner without a remedy on appeal.

We recognize that certiorari review of orders denying discovery is rarely appropriate. See State Farm Mutual…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Esman v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  2. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. PetersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Handford v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  2. Shindorf v. ShindorfDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API